Islamabad (GNP): Special tasks were assigned to all officers to ensure foolproof security during Muharram. Instructions were given to implement a comprehensive security plan to provide full protection to the participants of gatherings and processions.
Patrolling and search and rescue operations should be carried out at sensitive places. All officers should strengthen contacts with the administrators of Imam bargahs and peace committees, DIG Islamabad.
A detailed review of the routes of the processions should be conducted; cleaning of bushes and wild plants should be ensured on the routes. Effective checking should be ensured on the internal and external routes of the city, Imam bargahs, and places of worship. Muhammad Jawad Tariq.
Surveillance, monitoring and security monitoring system should be made more effective throughout the city. Complete checking of the mourners participating in gatherings and processions will be done through metal detectors.
Traffic police will remain active 24/7 to maintain traffic flow during Muharram. Protecting the lives and property of citizens and creating a peaceful environment is the top priority of Islamabad Police, said DIG Islamabad Muhammad Jawad Tariq.
FCC had already ruled that supremacy in constitutional adjudication now vests in it, and that all courts, including the Supreme Court, are bound by its pronouncements.
Also Read: FM Welcomes World Bank’s Ongoing Partnership in Priority Sectors
Legal experts believe that a clear divergence has emerged in the jurisprudence developed by the FCC and the Supreme Court following the 27th Constitutional Amendment.
The two courts have already expressed conflicting views on the government’s wedlock policy. The Supreme Court has held that the policy creates a legitimate expectation for married civil servants that they will be accommodated, rather than being subjected to arbitrary deviation without justification.
In contrast, the FCC has ruled that the wedlock policy cannot be used as grounds for indefinite posting and does not create any vested right.
Similarly, while the Supreme Court on May 12 directed the IHC to decide the Imaan Mazari case within a specified timeframe, the FCC’s recent judgment indicates disagreement with such an approach, particularly where deadlines are imposed on high courts for deciding matters
